SpaceX launched Starship for the sixth time but canceled the highly-anticipated 'chopsticks' maneuver minutes after lift-off

Fact Verified
This article has been verified by our fact-checking team. Last verified: 2024-11-19
Article image

Key Points

News Summary On November 19, 2024, SpaceX launched Starship Flight 6, which included a significant test of the Super Heavy booster and Starship upper stage. While the Starship stage achieved its goals, such as in-space engine reignition and thermal protection testing, the attempt to catch the Super Heavy booster with the "Mechazilla" tower's mechanical arms was aborted. The booster was instead directed to a controlled splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico. This decision has sparked discussions about the feasibility of SpaceX's ambitious recovery techniques.

POV 1: The Optimist's Perspective

From this perspective, the flight was a landmark success, with only minor setbacks. The optimist would highlight:

  • Achievements: The Starship upper stage successfully reignited its engine in space, a critical milestone for future missions.
  • Data Collection: The thermal protection testing provided invaluable insights into improving the spacecraft's durability during reentry.
  • Safety Over Risk: The decision to abort the booster catch was a proactive measure that avoided potentially catastrophic damage to Mechazilla and the booster. This cautious approach aligns with SpaceX's iterative development philosophy.

The optimist concludes that each test, successful or not, brings SpaceX closer to achieving full reusability and interplanetary travel, making the occasional aborted maneuver a minor hiccup in a groundbreaking journey.

POV 2: The Skeptic's Perspective

From this lens, the test raised questions about the practicality and risks of SpaceX's booster recovery system. The skeptic would argue:

  • Unmet Promises: The failure to execute the catch reveals gaps in SpaceX's readiness for fully operational reuse systems.
  • Economic Concerns: Every missed booster recovery adds costs and delays to the program, as SpaceX must rebuild or refurbish components rather than quickly reusing them.
  • Technical Challenges: The aborted catch highlights unresolved issues in the Mechazilla system's ability to handle dynamic conditions like wind, booster velocity, and alignment precision.

The skeptic suggests that SpaceX needs to recalibrate its expectations and refine its systems before declaring the Starship program ready for routine flights.

Analysis: Why SpaceX Did Not Catch the Booster

SpaceX’s decision to abort the Mechazilla catch attempt stemmed from several potential factors:

  1. Safety Protocols:
    SpaceX likely detected conditions that made the catch too risky, such as:

    • Misalignment of the booster during descent.
    • High wind speeds or turbulence affecting stability.
    • Unexpected variations in booster velocity or trajectory.

  2. System Iteration:
    The Mechazilla system is in its developmental phase. Each test flight is an opportunity to refine algorithms, hardware response times, and predictive analytics. The aborted attempt might have provided crucial data for improving the system without risking physical damage.

  3. Risk vs. Reward:
    Damaging the Mechazilla tower or the booster in an early-stage test could result in months of delays. SpaceX prioritized data collection over achieving a visually successful maneuver.

  4. Telemetry and Sensors:
    Data from the booster’s descent could have shown deviations outside acceptable thresholds for a catch. This information is invaluable for future flights.

Edit Article